[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080707110730.GG5643@ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:07:31 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Takashi Sato <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
axboe@...nel.dk, mtk.manpages@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
Hi!
> I still disagree with this whole patch. There is not reason to let
> the freeze request timeout - an auto-unfreezing will only confuse the
> hell out of the caller. The only reason where the current XFS freeze
> call can hang and this would be theoretically useful is when the
What happens when someone dirties so much data that vm swaps out
whatever process that frozen the filesystem?
I though that was why the timeout was there...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists