[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4873734F.4030808@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:01:51 -0300
From: Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@...il.com>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
CC: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, sameo@...nedhand.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 06/10] mfd: PCAP driver for the Motorola EZX GSM mobile
phones
Eric Miao escreveu:
> The irq2pcap[] array looks horrible to me. It's actually a sparse array.
> Isn't there a nice 1:1 mapping using a formular??
>
> Besides, the IRQ numbering scheme has now changed to a more generic way,
> I suggest to pull from Russell's latest git tree and rebase the IRQ
> part.
Will do as you suggested and get rid of the arrays.
> The following block of code:
>
> + if (pcap_data->cs >= 0) {
> + if (machine_is_ezx_a780() || machine_is_ezx_e680())
> + gpio_direction_output(pcap_data->cs, 1);
> + else
> + gpio_direction_output(pcap_data->cs, 0);
> + }
>
> has 3 occurrences in the driver (2 in ezx_ssp_pcap_putget, 1 in ezx_pcap_probe)
> which is good reason to fold this into the platform data.
>
> Well, if the above is done in platform data, I guess you won't mind another bit
> flag (e.g. PCAP_REDIRECT_IRQ or something alike) added in platform data, either
Moved to platform data. What should PCAP_REDIRECT_IRQ flag do?
--
Daniel Ribeiro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists