[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807081642.19507.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:42:18 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Maxim Shchetynin <maxim@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Gunnar von Boehn <VONBOEHN@...ibm.com>,
Mark Nelson <markn@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: AZFS file system proposal
On Monday 07 July 2008, Maxim Shchetynin wrote:
> > > + if (copy_to_user(target, (void*) pin, size)) {
> > > + rc = -EFAULT;
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> >
> > Question to the powerpc folks: is copy_to_user safe for an __iomem source?
> > Should there be two copies (memcpy_fromio and copy_to_user) instead?
>
> I leave this question open.
>
Cc:'ing some more people that might have more of a clue on this question.
_memcpy_fromio does a "sync" at the start and an "eieio" at the end.
IFAICT, neither are needed here because the source is always memory.
It also handles unaligned memory accesses, which copy_to_user should
also do correctly, so it *looks* like it should work with just a
copy_to_user, but it still feels wrong to use an __iomem pointer
as the source for a copy_to_user.
Any ideas?
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists