linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi: Disable IRQ 0 through I/O APIC for some HP systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200807081854.19323.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:54:18 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi: Disable IRQ 0 through I/O APIC for some HP systems

On Tuesday, 8 of July 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > (B) The current approach to setup timer as ExtINT.
> [...]
> > > (B) ??? who tested this, Rafael
> > 
> > Yes, I tested this.
> 
>  There is some confusion here apparently -- you certainly have not tested
> the timer as an ExtINTA interrupt during the course of this discussion,
> because the "8259A Virtual Wire" through the local APIC has always worked
> for you.  ExtINTA would be the next, fourth and final attempt before a
> panic().

Yes, you're right, sorry.

So in fact I didn't test B.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/