[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48739E87.2060604@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:06:15 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Change _node_to_cpumask_ptr to return const ptr
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>>> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Add check for node passed to node_to_cpumask V3
>>>>
>>>> * When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is set, the node passed to
>>>> node_to_cpumask and node_to_cpumask_ptr should be validated.
>>>> If invalid, then a dump_stack is performed and a zero cpumask
>>>> is returned.
>>>>
>>>> Based on "Fri Jun 27 10:06:06 PDT 2008" tip/master... ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> V2: Slightly different version to remove a compiler warning.
>>>> V3: Redone to reflect moving setup.c -> setup_percpu.c
>>> applied to tip/x86/unify-setup - thanks Mike.
>>>
>>> Vegard, can i add your Acked-by too?
>> To be honest, I'd prefer that the function returns a const pointer.
>> Mike and I have both reviewed all callers independently and concluded
>> that there is no problem in doing this, and that, in fact, this is the
>> correct way to deal with it.
>>
>> So if Mike submits a V4 with this const return type, or another patch
>> on top of this one, I'll ack it :-)
>
> ok, i'll wait for v4 :)
>
> (v3 is applied already so Mike please send a delta to v3.)
>
> Ingo
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Change _node_to_cpumask_ptr to return const ptr
* Strengthen the return type for the _node_to_cpumask_ptr to be
a const pointer. This adds compiler checking to insure that
node_to_cpumask_map[] is not changed inadvertently.
Applies to tip/master with the following patch applied:
"[PATCH 1/1] x86: Add check for node passed to node_to_cpumask V3"
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
---
Note: I did not change node_to_cpumask_ptr() in include/asm-generic/topology.h
as node_to_cpumask_ptr_next() does change the cpumask value.
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 8 ++++----
include/asm-x86/topology.h | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
+++ linux-2.6.tip/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
@@ -353,23 +353,23 @@ static const cpumask_t cpu_mask_none;
/*
* Returns a pointer to the bitmask of CPUs on Node 'node'.
*/
-cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
+const cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
{
if (node_to_cpumask_map == NULL) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"_node_to_cpumask_ptr(%d): no node_to_cpumask_map!\n",
node);
dump_stack();
- return &cpu_online_map;
+ return (const cpumask_t *)&cpu_online_map;
}
if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"_node_to_cpumask_ptr(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%d)\n",
node, nr_node_ids);
dump_stack();
- return (cpumask_t *)&cpu_mask_none;
+ return &cpu_mask_none;
}
- return (cpumask_t *)&node_to_cpumask_map[node];
+ return &node_to_cpumask_map[node];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_node_to_cpumask_ptr);
--- linux-2.6.tip.orig/include/asm-x86/topology.h
+++ linux-2.6.tip/include/asm-x86/topology.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ DECLARE_EARLY_PER_CPU(int, x86_cpu_to_no
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
extern int cpu_to_node(int cpu);
extern int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
-extern cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node);
+extern const cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node);
extern cpumask_t node_to_cpumask(int node);
#else /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS */
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static inline int early_cpu_to_node(int
}
/* Returns a pointer to the cpumask of CPUs on Node 'node'. */
-static inline cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
+static inline const cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
{
return &node_to_cpumask_map[node];
}
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static inline cpumask_t node_to_cpumask(
/* Replace default node_to_cpumask_ptr with optimized version */
#define node_to_cpumask_ptr(v, node) \
- cpumask_t *v = _node_to_cpumask_ptr(node)
+ const cpumask_t *v = _node_to_cpumask_ptr(node)
#define node_to_cpumask_ptr_next(v, node) \
v = _node_to_cpumask_ptr(node)
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ extern int __node_distance(int, int);
#define cpu_to_node(cpu) 0
#define early_cpu_to_node(cpu) 0
-static inline cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
+static inline const cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node)
{
return &cpu_online_map;
}
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static inline int node_to_first_cpu(int
/* Replace default node_to_cpumask_ptr with optimized version */
#define node_to_cpumask_ptr(v, node) \
- cpumask_t *v = _node_to_cpumask_ptr(node)
+ const cpumask_t *v = _node_to_cpumask_ptr(node)
#define node_to_cpumask_ptr_next(v, node) \
v = _node_to_cpumask_ptr(node)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists