linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 06/11] remove CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:11:33 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/11] remove CONFIG_KMOD from fs

On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 22:57 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:00:21PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >...
> > --- everything.orig/fs/nls/nls_base.c	2008-07-08 18:32:40.000000000 +0200
> > +++ everything/fs/nls/nls_base.c	2008-07-08 18:34:44.000000000 +0200
> >...
> > @@ -216,15 +214,13 @@ static struct nls_table *find_nls(char *
> >  struct nls_table *load_nls(char *charset)
> >  {
> >  	struct nls_table *nls;
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_KMOD
> >  	int ret;
> > -#endif
> 
> That gives an "unused variable" gcc warning with CONFIG_MODULES=n.

Actually, would anyone object to removing the printk and just using
try_then_request_module?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)