linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kexec jump -v12: kexec jump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080708104044.GA15327@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:40:45 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	nigel@...el.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kexec jump -v12: kexec jump

Hi!

> > > @@ -1411,3 +1421,50 @@ static int __init crash_save_vmcoreinfo_
> > >  }
> > > 
> > >  module_init(crash_save_vmcoreinfo_init)
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + *   kernel_kexec - reboot the system
> 
> > Really?
> 
> I will change the comments to reflect the changes to kernel_kexec.
> 
> > > + *   Move into place and start executing a preloaded standalone
> > > + *   executable.  If nothing was preloaded return an error.
> > > + */
> > > +int kernel_kexec(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     int error = 0;
> > > +
> > > +     if (xchg(&kexec_lock, 1))
> > > +             return -EBUSY;
> > 
> > That's quite a strange way to provide a lock. mutex_trylock?
> 
> I think this is because kexec_lock is used by crash_kexec() too, which
> may be called in some extreme environment, such as during panic().
> 
> > > +     if (!kexec_image) {
> > > +             error = -EINVAL;
> > > +             goto Unlock;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     if (kexec_image->preserve_context) {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP
> > > +             local_irq_disable();
> > > +             save_processor_state();
> > 
> > #else
> >         BUG()
> > 
> > ...because otherwise you silently do nothing?
> > 
> > > +#endif
> 
> If CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP is defined, kexec_image->preserve_context will
> always be 0. So current code is safe. Here, #ifdef is used to resolve
> the dependency issue. For example, save_processor_state() may be
> undefined if CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP is not defined.

Move the #ifdef outside the if (), then, so this is clear?

Actually, if preserve_context is always zero in !KEXEC_JUMP case, it
might make sense to remove whole variable...
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/