[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080708073637.32037c76@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 07:36:37 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
tytso@....edu, hugh@...itas.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, mchan@...adcom.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
> That's pure bullox as far as I can see. Why provide the means to
> do something nobody has had a need for in 6+ years? Who needs
> to load different firmware for the tg3 driver?
Who needs modules, nobody needed it for years ... you are repeating
historically failed arguments still.
> Who needs that capability? Distribution vendors? What for?
> In what case will they need to load different firmware from
> what the driver maintainer tested as a unit?
For some drivers yes. Maybe not tg3.
> And, btw, who has the right to enforce this new burdon upon driver
> maintainers when they have had a working and maintainable system for
> so long?
The module argument again - see my comment about the sound driver history.
> I can only see it being about separation, pure and simple.
Separation - of firmware that can be paged from code that cannot. Of
stuff that doesn't change from stuff that does. That happens to be good
engineering.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists