lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:33:42 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <>
To:	Johannes Weiner <>
Cc:	Mike Travis <>,,
	"H. Anvin" <>, Christoph Lameter <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>
Subject: Re: Dangerous code in cpumask_of_cpu?

On Tuesday 08 July 2008 18:54:38 Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Johannes Weiner <> writes:
> > But then, this code should probably just evaluate to m without this
> > obscure *(&m) construct.
> This, however is still possible, no?

Unfortunately this change was specifically made in the changeset I refered to, 
so that the &cpumask_of_cpu() could be passed :(

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists