[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4874B9D5.1020309@grandegger.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:15:01 +0200
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Luotao Fu <l.fu@...gutronix.de>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
Hi Fu (without n)
Luotao Fu wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Hi Fun,
>
> What's so funny? ;-)
Ah, oh, just a funny typo ;-).
> [...]
>
>> But as Steven pointed out, the preempt_enable_noresched at that place
>> might be illegal, anyway. In 2.6.25-rt, trace_mark() is no longer
>> used and I do not see an improvement with CONFIG_RCU_TRAC any more.
>> Latencies go up to 600us. I also tried with CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
>> disabled, but it did not improve the latencies. Actually, I still
>> measure significantly different latencies with 2.6.24.4-rt4,
>> 2.6.24.7-rt14 and 2.6.25.8-rt7, which is quite frustrating. As you
>> seem not be able to reproduce my high latencies, I wonder if there
>> are some toolchain or glibc related issues.
>
> I took a quick look into the rcppreempt boost stuff in 2.6.24-rt and
> 2.6.25-rt. As you have mentioned, trace_mark is no more used in
> 2.6.24-rt. Instead of that flags are used to detect if the task is
> preempted. It might indeed probably be some toolchain issue.
> My powerpc toolchain I'm using here contains gcc 4.1.2 and glibc 2.5
OK, in the past you have been able to reproduce the high latencies with
2.6.24-rt1 and CONFIG_RCU_TRACE disabled, IIRC. Did you use a different
toolchain at that time?
Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists