[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215610648.3295.99.camel@wirenth>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:37:28 +0100
From: ian <spyro@....com>
To: pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, Dmitry <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] MFD: Change mfd platform device usage to wrapper
platform_device
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 15:34 +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:28 PM, ian <spyro@....com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 13:07 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> I agree "power" and "etc." are issues. Clocks should be handled by the
> clock API just fine.
When its merged.
> > they cant just do it themselves because the subdevices may be used on
> > more than one core that does this hanling in different ways (eg. T7L and
> > TC6393XB handle the 32KHz clock completely differently.
>
> That shouln't matter with generic clocks. If they
> clk_get(&mfd_cell->pdev.dev, "my_clk_input"), that should be
> dispatched to the correct MFD clock regardless of the actual chip.
I agree but its not merged yet.
Until it is, we should stick with the enable / disable methods.
Also, suspend / resume for TC* need careful sequencing of the GPIOs
attached to #PCLR and #SUSPEND (get it wrong and you reset the chip
instead of sleep it)
:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists