[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4874C77F.7070602@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:13:19 -0400
From: jim owens <jowens@...com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, hch@...radead.org,
pavel@...e.cz, t-sato@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, mtk.manpages@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
Oops..
> WHY A TIMEOUT - need a way for operator to abort the
> freeze
instead of "abort" I should have said "limit" because
it is really proactive control (so they will not get
called in the middle of the night by pissed users).
I forgot to make it clear that TIMEOUT is the same as AUTO-THAW
in logging errors so the adnin knows they have a bad snapshot and
can do it again.
I also forgot to say that our customers all say they can deal
with retrying a snapshot, but not with unknown bad snapshots
and most definitely not with killing their 24/7 operations!
jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists