linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for July 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2008 16:30:28 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 9

On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 06:30:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since next-20080708:
> 
> Temporarily dropped tree: ttydev (since it would not import on top of any
> tree I have)
> 
> The x86 tree lost a conflict against the ftrace tree.
> 
> The ide tree gained 2 conflicts against Linus' tree.
> 
> The nfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> 
> The acpi tree lost 5 conflicts against various trees but gained another
> against the x86 tree.
> 
> The net tree lost 2 conflicts against the x86 wireless-current trees.
> 
> I have also applied the following patches for known problems (I assume
> that these will be merged into their appropriate trees shortly):
> 
> 	linux-next: zero based percpu build error on s390

Ingo, will you merge/pick this patch up? The original patch which causes
the problems came in via one of your git trees. Patch in question is

"Zero based percpu: infrastructure to rebase the per cpu area to zero"

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/