[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080709160011.GA10601@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:11 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>,
Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/15] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler (repost)
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@...e.hu) wrote:
>
> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
>
> > There were 2 rejects when I ported the patch to linux-next. Sorry.
> > Here is a repost.
>
> there's still a standing objection (NAK) from Peter Zijstra so none of
> this can go into linux-next yet i'm afraid.
>
> Ingo
Hi Ingo,
This "tracepoint" infrastructure has been created to answer to Peter's
concerns about trace_mark uglyness. The last comment I had from him when
we discussed the tracepoint idea was "Looking forward to your
proposal..", so I guess it's up to him to decide if tracepoints are
clean enough to live.
I'll submit a revised scheduler instrumentation which turns all
scheduler trace_mark() already in linux-next into tracepoints, with the
same arguments. ftrace will have to be updated accordingly.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists