[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215629381.18506.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:49:41 +0200
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...hat.com,
Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com, vvs@...ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark i2o config broken on 64-bit platforms.
(apologies for the bouncing mail earlier today, somebody [who _will_ buy
us all sushi tomorrow] broke our mail setup ...)
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 15:15 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl> wrote:
>
> > second, compiling it gives warnings, but it works, and I bet people are
> > using it.
>
> Maybe, but have you looked at i2o_cfg_passthru()? Take this, for example:
>
> /* Allocate memory for the transfer */
> p = kmalloc(sg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> ...
> //TODO 64bit fix
> sg[i].addr_bus = virt_to_bus(p);
>
> That looks distinctly dodgy. virt_to_bus() returns a 64-bit address, and as
> far as I know you may not assume that it will return a 32-bit address. You're
> taking the bus-address of a piece of RAM, but there may be more than 4GB of
> RAM in the system.
Oh dear, that's indeed bad. Looks like that should use i2o_dma_alloc()
instead. (drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c gets this right).
(and what's with the (unlocked!) pci_set_dma_mask() flipping in
i2o_dma_alloc() ? )
Mike.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists