[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440807091159l1a5da57tfec1e1c7f634ffea@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:59:12 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] tip/x86_64: fix e820 merge issue which broke max_pfn_mapped
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Suresh Siddha
<suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:05:46AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > BTW, please explain the need for your patch which has more changes, instead
>> > of my simple patch which was test booted on 3 different systems with both
>> > 32bit and 64bit kernels...
>>
>> try to reduce #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64/32, and make 32/64 at the same page.
>
> But it seem to have too many changes included in one patch.
>
> like calls to e820_register_active_regions(), remove_all_active_ranges()
> disappeared all together in this patch.. ??
old e820_end_of_ram() need to active_ranges aka early_node_map is initialized...
so if we make e820_end to get end of any type, we don't need to call
e820_register_active_regions anymore. and just letnuma code init that
later. to avoid extra operation.
should put more words in commit desc.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists