[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215630817.3444.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:13:37 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...hat.com, Markus.Lidel@...dowconnect.com, vvs@...ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark i2o config broken on 64-bit platforms.
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 21:06 +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:49 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:15:14 +0100
> > David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl> wrote:
> > > Maybe, but have you looked at i2o_cfg_passthru()? Take this, for example:
> > >
> > > /* Allocate memory for the transfer */
> > > p = kmalloc(sg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > ...
> > > //TODO 64bit fix
> > > sg[i].addr_bus = virt_to_bus(p);
> > >
> > > That looks distinctly dodgy. virt_to_bus() returns a 64-bit address, and as
> >
> > Agreed - stick | GFP_DMA32 on the end then ;)
>
> GFP_DMA32 doesn't work with kmalloc(), you need dma_alloc_coherent() or
> pci_alloc_consistent() [here, i2o_dma_alloc() ]
Yes it does ... it was specifically designed for it. GFP_DMA32 was
introduced to allow this type of thing to happen (in the old days most
drivers were allowed to assume kmalloc would return memory whose
physical address was < 4GB; GFP_DMA32 allows that to continue while
allowing kmalloc to stray beyond 4GB physical).
> GFP_DMA would work though, as a quick bandaid.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists