lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080709193404.GC4804@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:34:04 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses


* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> > This fragility makes me very nervous.  It seems hard enough to get 
> > this stuff working with current tools; making it work over the whole 
> > range of supported tools looks like its going to be hard.
> 
> (me too ;-)
> 
> Once I get a solid version working with (at least) gcc-4.2.4, then 
> regression testing with older tools will be easier, or at least a 
> table of results can be produced.

the problem is, we cannot just put it even into tip/master if there's no 
short-term hope of fixing a problem it triggers. gcc-4.2.3 is solid for 
me otherwise, for series of thousands of randomly built kernels.

can we just leave out the zero-based percpu stuff safely and could i 
test the rest of your series - or are there dependencies? I think 
zero-based percpu, while nice in theory, is probably just a very small 
positive effect so it's not a life or death issue. (or is there any 
deeper, semantic reason why we'd want it?)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ