[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48751533.7030602@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:44:51 -0400
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> the problem is, we cannot just put it even into tip/master if there's no
> short-term hope of fixing a problem it triggers. gcc-4.2.3 is solid for
> me otherwise, for series of thousands of randomly built kernels.
>
4.2.3 is fine; he was using 4.2.0 before, and as far as I know, 4.2.0
and 4.2.1 are known broken for the kernel.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists