[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4875212E.6090404@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:35:58 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> How does gcc know to use %gs instead of the usual %fs for accessing
> the stack protector variable? My older gcc-4.1.x on ubuntu always uses %fs.
>
-mcmodel=kernel
> Or we could do something completely evil. And use the other segment
> register for the stack canary.
>
That would still require gcc changes, so it doesn't help much.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists