[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080709210444.GN8517@trinity.fluff.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:04:44 +0100
From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] MFD: Change mfd platform device usage to wrapper platform_device
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:56:25PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:49:20AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > This patch changes the mfd core behaviour to wrapper the platform_device
> > it creates in an struct mfd_device which contains the information
> > about the cell that was created.
>
> You can't do this. Grab a reference to the platform device (by holding
> one of its sysfs files open) and then remove all the users of the mfd-core
> module and the mfd-core module itself.
>
> Then, read from that file and close it. Watch your kernel oops.
>
> That's why device release methods inside modules are a BAD IDEA and why
> we have the platform device alloc API.
Would this be fixed by grabbing a reference to the mfd-core module whilst
the mfd device is open?
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists