[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080709073358.GT11558@disturbed>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:33:58 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: arjan@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu,
pavel@...e.cz, t-sato@...jp.nec.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, mtk.manpages@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:13:34AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > The argument against Miklos' version is that there may be multiple
> > commands to execute while the fs is frozen.
>
> Which is what a shell is for ;)
Yeah, weĺl, with your method I ca't tell a user to:
# xfs_freeze -f /mntpt
# xfs_db -r -c 'sb 0' -c 'p rootino' /dev/foo
128
# xfs_db -r -c 'ino 128' -c 'p core.format' /dev/foo
core.format = 2 (extents)
# xfs_db .....
.....
# xfs_freeze -u /mntpt
i.e. using the freeze to force all metadata to disk and
prevent it from changing while doing interactive debugging
of some problem.
Yes, a one-shot freeze/unfreeze mechanism works for some
use cases. The point is that it does not work for them all.....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists