[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215590110.16579.7.camel@muff>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:55:10 +0100
From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, Stephen Tweedie <sct@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16 of 55] xen64: add extra pv_mmu_ops
Hey Jeremy,
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 15:06 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> We need extra pv_mmu_ops for 64-bit, to deal with the extra level of
> pagetable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.h | 15 +++++++++++-
> include/asm-x86/xen/page.h | 4 +++
> 4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> @@ -438,14 +438,19 @@
>
> void xen_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
> ptep->pte_high = pte.pte_high;
> smp_wmb();
> ptep->pte_low = pte.pte_low;
> +#else
> + *ptep = pte;
> +#endif
> }
You've dropped non-PAE support already, right? Any reason to use the
X86_PAE macro instead of X86_32?
Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists