[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080710075030.GA27361@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:50:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: akataria@...are.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] x86: Rename paravirtualized TSC functions
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > that would be the tip/xen64 stuff, right? Does this revert:
> >
> > | Revert "x86_64: there's no need to preallocate level1_fixmap_pgt"
> > |
> > | This reverts commit 033786969d1d1b5af12a32a19d3a760314d05329.
> > |
> > | Suresh Siddha reported that this broke booting on his 2GB testbox.
> >
> > solve your problems, or are there other problems still?
>
> still is bisecting it now...
ok. I have no mystery crash on my test-systems.
by the looks of it, your crashes seem to be pagetable related. If it's
in the tip/xen-64bit branch, my candidates would be:
0f38c08: x86: use __page_aligned_data/bss
0337869: x86_64: there's no need to preallocate level1_fixmap_pgt
89d7bb5: x86_64: add workaround for no %gs-based percpu
0337869 is reverted already.
Or if it's an older commit, two candidates would be:
b50efd2: x86: introduce page_size_mask for 64bit
3a9e189: x86: map UV chipset space - pagetable
do you know the sha1 of the first broken tree? We know that
tip-history-2008-07-08_16.08_Tue is known-good.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists