[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080710081206.GA4819@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:12:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: akataria@...are.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/05] x86: Rename paravirtualized TSC functions
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> first round bisect all works..
>
> it seems make oldconfig change setting between different setting...
yeah. The thing i do is this: i create a .config.bisect and at every
bisection step i copy it into .config and do a 'make oldconfig'.
this means that options are picked up again, even if a 'dive back into
the past' causes a bisection point to lose a config setting.
>
> diff .config config.full.good
> 4c4
> < # Thu Jul 10 00:52:52 2008
> ---
> > # Thu Jul 10 00:40:03 2008
> 295,296c295
> < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL=y
> < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> ---
> > # CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is not set
>
> it seems some recent change doesn't like stackprotector.
then my guess would be on:
89d7bb5: x86_64: add workaround for no %gs-based percpu
you might want to try your luck and revert that one alone from latest
tip/master.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists