| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240807100815j6bda3c63q4fc4d0c5da826fe3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:15:07 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@...il.com> To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux Wireless Mini-Summit -- Ottawa -- July 22, 2008 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote: > >> 1500 Future work > > Maybe something about testing? Or I'll do a testing brainstorming > session after dinner. > > Obviously, testing at orbit never worked out, but it'd be good to have > _something_ other than everybody testing their thing locally. Ties in > with the virtual hardware, maybe? > >From the driver perspective it would be loop back phy (tx/rx), The peer side might be running on virtual HW. Currently it's not easy to establish automated regression over the air. Good portion of the flows can be tested this way. I'm also looking for easier bug reporting for unexperienced users maybe some uevent/HAL popping to application and emails it out/. Not sure really how to handle this and not create spams. I'm just expecting more real 'end users'. Thanks Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists