linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] How to handle the rules engine for cgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830807100941k330bb62cg7ae6a3d611e2dffa@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:41:06 -0700
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux kernel mailing list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Libcg Devel Mailing List" <libcg-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <pzijlstr@...hat.com>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	"Kazunaga Ikeno" <k-ikeno@...jp.nec.com>,
	"Morton Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] How to handle the rules engine for cgroups

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> This looks interesting. So above method should solve atleast the
> reliability issue of event transport to user space. Got few thougts.
>
> - Hopefully number of hiearchies will not explode as we will be
>  mounting one hierarchies per event type (uid change, gid change,
>  exec, maybe fork etc.).

In what circumstances would you want to reclassify processes to a
different cgroup on a fork?

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/