| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:57:51 +0530 From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@...hat.com>, linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Libcg Devel Mailing List <libcg-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, Morton Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [Libcg-devel] [RFC] How to handle the rules engine for cgroups On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 01:19:39PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:41:06AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote: > > > > > > This looks interesting. So above method should solve atleast the > > > reliability issue of event transport to user space. Got few thougts. > > > > > > - Hopefully number of hiearchies will not explode as we will be > > > mounting one hierarchies per event type (uid change, gid change, > > > exec, maybe fork etc.). > > > > In what circumstances would you want to reclassify processes to a > > different cgroup on a fork? > > I don't know. Balbir had mentioned in one of the mails in this thread > regarding getting notification on fork. fork or exec? I believe reclassifications would happen only on exec. -- regards, Dhaval -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists