[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48764BA5.7050104@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:49:25 -0400
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [regression?] 2.6.26 floppy boot failure with kernel packed using
'upx'
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
>> Important factor here is that we "pack" the kernel using upx [1] (in order
>> to fit everything on a floppy). The original (unpacked) kernel after this
>> commit boots fine, only a packed version fails.
>> We have tried upx versions 2.01, 3.01 and 3.03, all with same result.
>
> Ok, I do not consider this to be a regression.
>
> Clearly UPX is expecting a very specific kernel format, and clearly UPX
> just needs to be updated for the changes.
>
> That said, if some UPX person can explain what it is that UPX needs, maybe
> we can add some format markers into the kernel (and perhaps some extra
> header info) so that future format changes are transparent or at least
> break in obvious ways.
>
The issue with UPX is that UPX actually wants to replace the kernel
decompressor, which also does other tasks (relocation and ELF parsing)
in recent kernels.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists