[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080710180620.GA30844@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:06:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.25
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> cool! :)
>
> (hm, could anyone please resend Nick's original mail? The original one
> is not in my lkml folder nor on lkml.org - only the quoted one.)
ok, got the mail now now:
| | Annoyed this wasn't a crazy obscure error in the algorithm I could
| | fix :) [...]
Paul recently ran a formal proof against all sorts of RCU details (and
found and fixed a few obscure races that way that no-one ever
triggered), so i'd be quite surprised if we found anything in the core
algorithm :-)
| | [...] I spent all day debugging it and had to make a special test
| | case (rcutorture didn't seem to trigger it), and a big RCU state
| | logging infrastructure to log millions of RCU state transitions and
| | events. Oh well.
nice debugging!
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
i'm wondering why rcutorture didnt trigger it. I do run !HOTPLUG +
RCU_PREEMPT kernels and never saw this. Nor did Paul. That aspect is
weird.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists