[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080710181234.GA32174@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:12:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86/pci: patches for tip/x86/unify-pci
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> wrote:
>
> > This patch series contains patches for tip/x86/unify-pci. It fixes
> > NUMA initialization code reflecting latest changes in tip/master.
> > Also there are build fixes and minor cleanups. Patch #5 is a cherry
> > pick that fixes build on UP systems. Code reboots for smp/nosmp,
> > acpi/noacpi, numaq, 32/64bit. It compiles for visws.
>
> thanks Robert. Today i've eliminated the VISWS subarch which greatly
> simplified your series. I've picked up these two fixes:
>
> Robert Richter (2):
> x86/pci merge: fixing numaq initialization
> x86/pci: fix warnings in subsys_initcall functions
btw., this is how arch/x86/pci/Makefile looks like now in tip/master:
----------------------------------------->
pci-y := fixup.o
pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o
pci-y += legacy.o irq.o
pci-$(CONFIG_X86_VISWS) += visws.o
pci-$(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ) += numa.o
obj-y += $(pci-y) common.o early.o
obj-y += amd_bus.o
<-----------------------------------------
it's _really_ clean now, and we dont have those weird overrides anymore.
Both VisWS and NUMAQ are now two straightforward runtime PCI overrides -
not build-time complications. Much more maintainable i think.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists