[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1zloptrwt.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:17:54 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Mike Travis <travis@....com> writes:
> The biggest growth came from moving all the xxx[NR_CPUS] arrays into
> the per cpu area. So you free up a huge amount of unused memory when
> the NR_CPUS count starts getting into the ozone layer. 4k now, 16k
> real soon now, ??? future?
Hmm. Do you know how big a role kernel_stat plays.
It is a per cpu structure that is sized via NR_IRQS. NR_IRQS is by NR_CPUS.
So ultimately the amount of memory take up is NR_CPUS*NR_CPUS*32 or so.
I have a patch I wrote long ago, that addresses that specific nasty configuration
by moving the per cpu irq counters into pointer available from struct irq_desc.
The next step which I did not get to (but is interesting from a scaling perspective)
was to start dynamically allocating the irq structures.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists