linux-kernel - Re: uml: sparse inlines gcc-4.{2,3} compilation hack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080710204248.GA21205@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:42:48 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...ga.by>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: uml: sparse inlines gcc-4.{2,3} compilation hack

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 03:50:29PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Small ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 .config is in attach.
> How to fix properly such kind of miscompilation? (gcc-4.3.1)
> Now I have to use hacks like this:

Use the patch below instead.

    	      	    Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com


commit 4f81c5350b44bcc501ab6f8a089b16d064b4d2f6
Author: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 7 13:36:56 2008 -0400

    [UML] fix gcc ICEs and unresolved externs
    
    There are various constraints on the use of unit-at-a-time:
     - i386 uses no-unit-at-a-time for pre-4.0 (not 4.3)
     - x86_64 uses unit-at-a-time always
    
    Uli reported a crash on x86_64 with gcc 4.1.2 with unit-at-a-time,
    resulting in commit c0a18111e571138747a98af18b3a2124df56a0d1
    
    Ingo reported a gcc internal error with gcc 4.3 with no-unit-at-a-timem,
    resulting in 22eecde2f9034764a3fd095eecfa3adfb8ec9a98
    
    Benny Halevy is seeing extern inlines not resolved with gcc 4.3 with
    no-unit-at-a-time
    
    This patch reintroduces unit-at-a-time for gcc >= 4.0, bringing back the
    possibility of Uli's crash.  If that happens, we'll debug it.
    
    I started seeing both the internal compiler errors and unresolved
    inlines on Fedora 9.  This patch fixes both problems, without so far
    reintroducing the crash reported by Uli.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@...ux.intel.com>
    Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
    Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
    Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
    Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile b/arch/um/Makefile
index dbeab15..ca40397 100644
--- a/arch/um/Makefile
+++ b/arch/um/Makefile
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ include $(srctree)/$(ARCH_DIR)/Makefile-os-$(OS)
 KERNEL_DEFINES = $(strip -Derrno=kernel_errno -Dsigprocmask=kernel_sigprocmask \
 			 -Dmktime=kernel_mktime $(ARCH_KERNEL_DEFINES))
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(KERNEL_DEFINES)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-unit-at-a-time,)
 
 PHONY += linux
 
diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile-i386 b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
index 561e373..302cbe5 100644
--- a/arch/um/Makefile-i386
+++ b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
@@ -32,4 +32,11 @@ cflags-y += $(call cc-option,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2)
 # an unresolved reference.
 cflags-y += -ffreestanding
 
+# Disable unit-at-a-time mode on pre-gcc-4.0 compilers, it makes gcc use
+# a lot more stack due to the lack of sharing of stacklots.  Also, gcc
+# 4.3.0 needs -funit-at-a-time for extern inline functions.
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(shell if [ $(call cc-version) -lt 0400 ] ; then \
+			echo $(call cc-option,-fno-unit-at-a-time); \
+			else echo $(call cc-option,-funit-at-a-time); fi ;)
+
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cflags-y)
diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile-x86_64 b/arch/um/Makefile-x86_64
index 8ed362f..a9cd7e7 100644
--- a/arch/um/Makefile-x86_64
+++ b/arch/um/Makefile-x86_64
@@ -21,3 +21,6 @@ HEADER_ARCH := x86
 
 LINK-$(CONFIG_LD_SCRIPT_DYN) += -Wl,-rpath,/lib64
 LINK-y += -m64
+
+# Do unit-at-a-time unconditionally on x86_64, following the host
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-funit-at-a-time)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/