[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30807110326s4b5cbad6j83ca0fe9db299f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:26:47 +0900
From: "Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hjk@...utronix.de" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
"lethal@...ux-sh.org" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio: uio_pdrv_genirq V3
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
<Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com> wrote:
> Magnus Damm wrote:
>> - kept irq control spinlock to serialize user space access
> I think you want to assert, that after a succeeded
>
> echo 0 > /dev/uioX
>
> the userspace doesn't need to check for a pending irq?! What happens if
> the irq triggers before you take the lock?
No, I'm not trying to solve anything like that. =)
The serialization code is only there to correctly handle multiple
processes/threads.
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists