[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080711171935.GA25603@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:19:35 +0200
From: Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@...03.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: send correct MTU value in PMTU
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:34:23AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:47:35 +0200
> Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@...03.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
>
> port should always be non-null so the existing fake_rtable can
> just go away no?
I wondered about that too. But since bridge_parent() is also checking port
for NULL, and the code calling this is carefully checking these cases, i
assumed that this is quite possible. If you can assert that port is
non-NULL, we can remove this, but i have to admit that i don't get the
whole picture to be sure about this.
>
> Also some of this could be #ifdef CONFIG_BRNETFILTER
Thanks, you're right. I will prepare the patch again with some #ifdefs.
regards,
Simon
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists