[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807111116460.2936@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> So making the callback just return an error is the right thing to do -
> because the callers will then fix up the file offset in the last directory
> entry and the final return value.
That said, I didn't actually _test_ my patch. That's what users are for!
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists