linux-kernel - Re: [patch 13/17] Use WARN() in drivers/base/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080711122011.7ddf42ef.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:20:11 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [patch 13/17] Use WARN() in drivers/base/

On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:53:07 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>Index: linux.trees.git/drivers/base/core.c

A number of these patches had mangled signed-off-by: lines.

Please try to be consistent in the presence and placement of the ^--- line
at the end of the changelog.

I verified that all three copies of "Use WARN() in fs/" were the same.

I've decided that I don't like the whole thing :(  This:

#define WARN(condition, format...) ({					\
	int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);				\
	if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on))					\
		__WARN_printf(format);					\
	unlikely(__ret_warn_on);					\
})

is not a WARN().  It is a WARN_ON() function.  The use of this name now leaves
us no sensible name under which to implement

#define WARN(format...)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/