[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080711231138.5d3443b8@linux360.ro>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:11:38 +0300
From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] kmemtrace RFC patch series
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:38:41 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> Hi Eduard,
>
> Did you have a look at the new tracepoints infrastructure ? I think it
> could simplify your patchset a _lot_ !
Hi,
Yes, I did. In fact, I asked you to keep me Cc-ed, which you did.
> Basically, it removes the format string from markers and allows to
> pass complex structure pointers as arguments. It aims at simplifying
> the life of in-kernel tracers which would want to use the facility.
> Turning a marker implementation to tracepoints is really
> straightforward, for an example see :
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/9/569
>
> For the tracepoints patchset :
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/9/199
>
> I think much of include/linux/kmemtrace.h, which is really just
> wrappers around marker code, could then go away.
Basically, I want just as much to get rid of markers. I'm just waiting
for tracepoints to get closer to mainline.
Cheers,
Eduard
> Regards,
>
> Mathieu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists