[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200807112306.39455.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:06:38 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: today's linux-next fails to boot
On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2008-07-11 16:59, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > * Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>> [Added Ingo to Cc]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I get the boot problem on i386 with 2008-07-11 linux-next tree, too.
> > > > >>> In my case, no error appears on the screen, just staying blank and
> > > > >>> dead. It seems stopping at the very beginning, soon after GRUB, so
> > > > >>> could be the same reason.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> I don't see any boot messages on the screen, I get that BUG message as
> > > > >> soon as grub's menu dissapears.
> > > > >> I have bisected it to this range so far:
> > > > >> git-bisect good aa03060a78c1aec53075a0c8ca7be19cedfbea8f
> > > > >> git-bisect bad b1611c0058bc6635e7257e755c3f194933a7a6df
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Should I continue to bisect?
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > could you check latest tip/master, does it boot fine with the same
> > > > > config?
> > > >
> > > > tip/master boots fine.
> > >
> > > to update linux-next to the latest bits in -tip, you can perhaps do
> > > something like this:
> > >
> > > git-merge tip/auto-x86-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-core-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-cpus4096-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-ftrace-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-generic-ipi-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-genirq-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-latest
> > > git-merge tip/auto-safe-poison-pointers-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-sched-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-stackprotector-next
> > > git-merge tip/auto-timers-next
> > >
> > > but it's easily possible that the bug is in some other portion of
> > > linux-next.
> >
> > Hm, I haven't tested the linux-next from today myself yet, but I have
> > a related question. Namely, is there a way to get a log of commits
> > that have been added since the previous linux-next?
> >
> > That may help to find a guilty patch if the yesterday's linux-next
> > works.
>
> at least in -tip it works like this:
>
> git-shortlog tip-history-2008-07-10_09.58_Thu..
>
> or, a more practical format with commit IDs on the same line:
>
> git log --no-merges --pretty=format:"%h: %s" \
> tip-history-2008-07-10_09.58_Thu..
>
> you can restrict it to a given piece of code as well, say:
>
> git log --no-merges --pretty=format:"%h: %s" \
> tip-history-2008-07-10_09.58_Thu.. -- arch/x86/ include/asm-x86/
>
> this doesnt work in linux-next nearly as well, due to the Quilt imported
> trees. Every time a quilt queue is updated and reimported, there's a
> stream of repeat commits.
Thanks for the tips.
Well, it turns out that linux-next from today doesn't boot on my box too
(64-bit) and I don't see anything obviously suspicious. Bisection time.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists