linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080712075532.13483b21@infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:55:32 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix delayed signals

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:42:13 +0300
Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com> wrote:

> On 2008-07-12 13:32, Török Edwin wrote:
> > I haven't yet tried ftrace on this box, and neither did I try
> > Roland's patch yet. I will try that now, and hopefuly come back
> > with some numbers shortly.
> >   
> 
> tip/master of today already includes Roland's patch, so I have tested
> it without even knowing on the 64-bit box.
> [After gathering all the traces, I wanted to repeat everything with
> the patch applied, but there was no need since its already there].
> I can say that I didn't notice any difference in the delays (I still
> get 24 - 30 second delays).
> I also tried Linus's readdir patch, the latency is around 27 seconds
> (was 30 before). I am not sure if it is an improvement, or measurement
> noise.
> 
> Also I wasn't able to reproduce the  'Ctrl+Z works faster than Ctrl+C'
> symptom, perhaps it is just a coincidence: by the time I press Ctrl+Z
> to interrupt, enough time has passed (30+ secs), that the same effect
> would have been obtained by another Ctrl+C, or by just waiting.
> 
> On 32-bit, I think the 2-3 seconds latency can be attributed to I/O
> delays, and I think its acceptable given the slow disk (5k4 rpm sata).

I see really bad delays on 32 bit as well, but they go away for me if I
do
echo 4096 > /sys/block/sda/queue/nr_requests



-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/