[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807121603150.2959@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>
> (A little pet horse for the occasion: Testing can show the presence of
> errors, but not their absence. But that's a different story.)
Absolutely. Which is actually why I prefer my patch. I think it fixes - in
general - the issue of CPU migration migrating tasks back to the CPU that
we're taking down.
The other patches seem to work around just the problem that _triggers_ the
bug. They don't actually make it impossible to migrate to a CPU that is
getting shut down - they just try to avoid the particular sequence that
made it happen for you.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists