[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215834342.7549.151.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:45:42 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grundler@...isc-linux.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, jgarzik@...ox.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add support for multiple MSI
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 17:28 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, it seems that mask/unmask of MSI has problems.
> - Per-vector masking is optional for MSI, so I think that allocating
> multiple messages for a function without masking capability would be
> not good idea, since all vector in the block will be masked/unmasked
> at once without any agreement.
> - Even if the function supports per-vector masking, current
> mask/unmask_msi_irq() functions assume that MSI uses only one vector,
> therefore they only set/unset the first bit of the maskbits which
> for the first vector of the block. The bits for other vectors are
> initialized as 'masked' but no one unmask them.
I tend to think we should just do soft-masking anyway for MSI... better
than whacking config space.
Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists