[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080712044707.GA6675@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:47:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Török Edwin <edwintorok@...il.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: today's linux-next fails to boot
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> [--snip--]
> >
> > Well, it turns out that linux-next from today doesn't boot on my box too
> > (64-bit) and I don't see anything obviously suspicious. Bisection time.
>
> I have identified the source of the breakage on my box, but I don't
> really think it's the same problem that Edwin is observing.
>
> Namely, it turns out that some code in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, as
> in today's linux-next, doesn't really make sense, because we have two
> conflicting DMA-based quirks in there for the same set of boxes (HP
> nx6325 and nx6125) and one of them actually breaks my box.
>
> I have reported that already, but it probably got lost somewhere.
>
> Below is a patch that fixes things for me, on top of today's
> linux-next. Please apply.
thanks Rafael, i have applied your fix to tip/x86/core and to
auto-x86-next as well.
what happened is a case of too many fixes for the same problem :-/
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists