[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2e108260807120052j5264ba21u118dda546128dd35@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:52:47 +0200
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
"Rafiu Fakunle" <rafiu@...nfiler.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Mike Mazarick" <mazarick@...lsouth.net>,
"Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@...erion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Pete Wyckoff" <pw@....edu>,
"Ross S. W. Walker" <rwalker@...allion.com>,
scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@...nk.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Jerome Martin" <tramjoe.merin@...il.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>,
"Linux-iSCSI.org Target Dev"
<linux-iscsi-target-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Generic SCSI Target Mid-level For Linux (followup)
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
<nab@...ux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> Using MC/S with a modern iSCSI implementation to take advantage of lots
> of cores and hardware threads is something that allows one to multiplex
> across multiple vendor's NIC ports, with the least possible overhead, in
> the OS INDEPENDENT manner.
Why do you emphasize MC/S so much ? Any datacenter operator that has
the choice between MC/S and using a faster network technology will
choose the last IMHO. It's much more convenient to use e.g. 10 GbE
instead of multiple 1 GbE connections.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists