[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080711175015.a96d18f7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:50:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: smfrench@...il.com, niallain@...il.com,
linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [CIFS] fix inode leak in cifs_get_inode_info_unix
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:57:38 -0400 Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:57:38 -0400
hm, nine days and afaict this post-2.6.25 regression remains unfixed?
> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.2
>
> Try this:
>
> mount a share with unix extensions
> create a file on it
> umount the share
>
> You'll get the following message in the ring buffer:
>
> VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of cifs. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a
> nice day...
>
> ...the problem is that cifs_get_inode_info_unix is creating and hashing
> a new inode even when it's going to return error anyway. The first
> lookup when creating a file returns an error so we end up leaking this
> inode before we do the actual create. This appears to be a regression
> caused by commit 0e4bbde94fdc33f5b3d793166b21bf768ca3e098.
>
> The following patch seems to fix it for me, and fixes a minor
> formatting nit as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
So it's probably too late to get this into 2.6.26. I'll merge it with
a cc:stable and hopefully 2.6.26.1 will not have this bug.
I'll give "fix wksidarr declaration to be big-endian friendly" the same
treatment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists