lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487880D7.1040608@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:00:55 +0800
From:	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken

on 2008-7-12 11:28 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> Can somebody else please test/ack/review it too? This should eventually
>> go into 2.6.26 if it doesn't break anything else.
> 
> And Dmitry, _please_ also explain what was going on. Why did things break 
> from calling common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug() too much? That function is 
> called pretty randomly anyway (for just about any random CPU event), so 
> why did it fail in some circumstances?
> 
> 		Linus
> 

My explanation:
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/7/75
this bug occurred on the kernel compiled with CONFIG_CPUSETS=y.

As Dmitry said in the following mail, modifying try_to_wake_up() to fix this bug
is not perfect. Maybe we need update the sched domain before migrating tasks.
	http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/7/94

So I remake a patch to fix this bug by updating the sched domain when a cpu is in
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE state.

I think Vegard Nossum's patch is not so good because it is not necessary to detach
all the sched domains when making a cpu offline.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>

---
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
 kernel/cpuset.c       |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/sched.c        |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index c5d3f84..cf40eae 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -817,6 +817,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
 #endif
 };
 
+extern void detach_sched_domains(int cpu);
 extern void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_t *doms_new,
 				    struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new);
 extern int arch_reinit_sched_domains(void);
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 9fceb97..64fa742 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1910,13 +1910,33 @@ static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
  */
 
 static int cpuset_handle_cpuhp(struct notifier_block *unused_nb,
-				unsigned long phase, void *unused_cpu)
+				unsigned long phase, void *hcpu)
 {
-	if (phase == CPU_DYING || phase == CPU_DYING_FROZEN)
-		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+	int cpu = (long)hcpu;
 
-	common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug();
-	return 0;
+	switch (phase) {
+	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
+	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
+		cgroup_lock();
+		get_online_cpus();
+		detach_sched_domains(cpu);
+		put_online_cpus();
+		cgroup_unlock();
+		break;
+
+	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
+	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
+	case CPU_DEAD:
+	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
+	case CPU_ONLINE:
+	case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
+		common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug();
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+	}
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 4e2f603..73e0026 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7315,6 +7315,32 @@ static int dattrs_equal(struct sched_domain_attr *cur, int idx_cur,
 			sizeof(struct sched_domain_attr));
 }
 
+
+/*
+ * Detach sched domains from a group of cpus which are in the same domain with
+ * the specified cpu. These cpus will now be attach to the NULL domain.
+ *
+ * Call with hotplug lock and cgroup lock held
+ */
+void detach_sched_domains(int cpu)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	unregister_sched_domain_sysctl();
+
+	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ndoms_cur; i++) {
+		if (cpu_isset(cpu, doms_cur[i])) {
+			detach_destroy_domains(doms_cur + i);
+			cpus_clear(doms_cur[i]);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+}
+
 /*
  * Partition sched domains as specified by the 'ndoms_new'
  * cpumasks in the array doms_new[] of cpumasks. This compares
@@ -7481,6 +7507,7 @@ int sched_create_sysfs_power_savings_entries(struct sysdev_class *cls)
 static int update_sched_domains(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 				unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 {
+#ifndef CONFIG_CPUSETS
 	switch (action) {
 	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
 	case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
@@ -7506,7 +7533,6 @@ static int update_sched_domains(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 	}
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_CPUSETS
 	/*
 	 * Create default domain partitioning if cpusets are disabled.
 	 * Otherwise we let cpusets rebuild the domains based on the
-- 
1.5.4.rc3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ