[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0807120405j3a0d28eaq26df8858b2ff3d3d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:05:49 +0200
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To: miaox@...fujitsu.com
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>,
"Max Krasnyansky" <maxk@...lcomm.com>, "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
2008/7/12 Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>:
> [ ... ]
>
> My explanation:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/7/75
> this bug occurred on the kernel compiled with CONFIG_CPUSETS=y.
>
> As Dmitry said in the following mail, modifying try_to_wake_up() to fix this bug
> is not perfect. Maybe we need update the sched domain before migrating tasks.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/7/94
>
> So I remake a patch to fix this bug by updating the sched domain when a cpu is in
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE state.
>
> I think Vegard Nossum's patch is not so good because it is not necessary to detach
> all the sched domains when making a cpu offline.
(that was my "not so good" patch :-)
Yes, maybe. OTOH, your patch does it in a more drastic way which
should be analyzed more carefully.
Perhaps, for .27 but that's just my 2 cents.
Plus, rebuild_sched_domains() has to be called only for cpu-hotplug events.
(I guess it just shows once more that common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug()
should be re-designed a bit)
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists