linux-kernel - Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48789EC3.2070701@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:08:35 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...ealbox.com>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume

Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> My Lenovo X61s fails to resume if I suspend it from within X, on both
> 2.6.26-rc9 and recent wireless-testing.  2.6.26-rc8 is fine, as is
> wireless-testing with 4b4f7280 reverted.  My in-progress bisect between
> -rc8 and -rc9 is also consistent with this being the problem.

With "this" do you mean the patch being applied or not applied?

As in does it fail with the patch applied?

You can confirm that by only applying the patch and testing.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/