[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tkrat.c946d53f67bae7d5@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] firewire: fix race of bus reset with request
transmission
I wrote:
> Contexts which access an instance of struct fw_transaction are:
> 1. the submitter, until it inserted the packet which is embedded in the
> transaction into the AT req DMA,
> 2. the AsReqTrContext tasklet when the request packet was acked by the
> responder node or transmission to the responder failed,
> 3. the AsRspRcvContext tasklet when it found a request which matched
> an incoming response,
> 4. the card->flush_timer when it picks up timed-out transactions to
> cancel them,
> 5. the bus reset tasklet when it cancels transactions (this access is
> eliminated by this patch),
> 6. a process which shuts down an fw_card (unregisters it from fw-core
> when the controller is unbound from fw-ohci) --- although in this
> case there shouldn't really be any transactions anymore because we
> wait until all card users finished their business with the card.
>
> All of these contexts run concurrently (except for the 6th, presumably).
PS: Actually the three tasklets (2nd, 3rd, 5th context) are all
scheduled on the same CPU, hence are serialized. Therefore
> The 5th looks safe against 2nd, 3rd [...] but is unsafe against 1st.
5th is serialized against 4th and 6th by lock protection of
card->transaction_list accesses.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -=== -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists