[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807131117530.2959@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree. And I did _not_ say that the current design is sane. My
> impression about changes acceptable during a late release cycle was
> utterly CRAPPY (indeed, it's always better to immediately fix a
> problem the right way, not just add another patch and pray it doesn't
> break somewhere else).
I do agree that since I really want to do 2.6.26 (and I don't think this
single issue is worth holding anything up for, considering that we do have
a tested and understood patch - I was worried for a while), for now we'll
do the minimal thing, and release 2.6.26 with just that.
I just want the longer-term strategy to be something more understandable
that doesn't depend on very subtle ordering of various different callback
functions etc.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists